Until recently, I believed DPM was a straightforward, singular technology. Laser etching or ablating a barcode directly onto a metal or plastic machine part or subassembly was DPM, pure and simple.  Printing a barcode on a label or package was not DPM. I thought of DPM as a process. Here is how the ISO organization defines DPM .

The ISO/IEC 29158 definition of DPM is as follows:

“Direct Part Marking (DPM) is a technology whereby, generally, an item is physically altered to produce two different surface conditions.”

Hmm…

Hmm, not sure this reassures me of my correctness.

Recently, barcodes are laser-imaged on logistics packaging by ablating the image from a patch of black coating.  No problem with negative imaging–Datamatrix barcodes readily accept negative imaging. but is this DPM? It is a package, not a part or subassembly.

More Hmm…

Upon more careful reading of the ISO/IEC 29158 definition, ablating in this manner fits the description. So then, what is DPM?

One consideration is that DPM is based on a low reflective difference between the barcode and the substrate. Barcodes printed on labels have a required and relatively high minimum difference in reflectivity between the barcode and the background.

Another consideration is illumination. A DPM scanner has a range of lighting angles to enhance the reflective differences, enabling the scanner to capture and decode the barcode. It’s easy to see how this might make a directedly imaged barcode on a metal part easier to scan: the barcode reflects light differently than the rest of the substrate.

Doesn’t that disqualify a barcode laser-ablated out of a black patch on a cardboard box? Not necessarily. Conventional scanners for printed barcodes operate at 45 degrees. DPM scanners also have a 45-degree setting (and several other angles too).

By now, maybe  you are wondering if this is not just a tempest in a teapot. What’s the big deal? Well…

There another difference between a conventional scanner and a DPM scanner.

This is the less obvious difference between a conventional scanner and a DPM scanner. The latter can optimize the maximum and minimum reflectance levels to make the subtle transitions between dark and light more evident.

That is the key to defining and, therefore, differentiating  DPM. Although there may be process differences in how the image is created, what is—and what is not—DPM comes down to scanning. If special illumination and reflectance enhancement are required, it’s DPM.

Risk Management or Wishful Thinking

Sidenote: barcode verification is a standards-based method to predict that a barcode will scan properly out there in the real world, with a variety of scanners in various environments. Since bad barcodes can be a significant liability, verification is an important form of risk management. Tweaking the verifier to get a better verification grade defeats this. Using DPM settings to get a better verification grade on a barcode printed on a label is a bad idea. Yes, we have seen this done.

Questions? Contact us here.

 

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager