Some substrates can be very challenging for barcodes. The UDI requirement has introduced some new situations. Recently we were invited to a company that prints linear barcodes on clear plastic drip bags that hang at hospital bedsides, infusing a patient with a solution through the IV. Sounds simple, but it is surprisingly challenging.

Aluminum cans and infusion bags

marcelo leal on unsplash

Not unlike the world of barcodes on aluminum soda cans, some barcodes on infusion bags are reverse printed. Treating the bare bag as the low reflectance value,  the quiet zones and spaces are printed in white. While this sounds like a reliable solution, it doesn’t consistently work well.

We have also worked with a manufacturer doing the exact opposite: printing black barcodes on infusion bags, treating the bare substrate as the high reflectance value. And here again, it doesn’t consistently work well. How could this be? Shouldn’t one method or the other work well?

“Working well” can be elusive. At the company we recently visited, the scanners on their vision system read their black-on-clear barcodes perfectly but their verifiers were unable to decode them; and when they did, they always failed. How can you be assured these barcodes will work wherever they go?

The nursing staff at a local hospital report that white, reverse-printed barcodes scan successfully scan some of the time. Our verifiers are unable to read them. In other words, either method of printing barcodes on the bare bag is unpredictable. What’s going on here?

Haemonetics SRP CROPPED
Notice the fairly consistent high reflectivity of the left quiet zone, and the much lower and inconsistent reflectivity of the narrow, medium space and wide spaces. This is because the adjacent bars restrict the return signal from the semi-refractive clear plastic substrate.

The problem is obviously the plastic bag. Why does it behave so inconsistently? The answer is subtle—and interesting. The plastic material, like an aluminum soda can, is neither entirely reflective nor refractive. It is a little of both and there lies the problem. Here’s the really interesting part. When wide bars flank narrow spaces, the reflectance of the narrow space is disproportionately less compared to a wide space, or the quiet zones.

Visual Inspection Reveals the Problem

This can be observed visually. The verification report and in particular, the Scan Reflectance Profile, shows exactly what is happening and why these barcodes fail.  The reflectance values for the bare substrate is variable, and this reflectance difference triggers the Modulation parameter and causes the barcode to fail.

The Solution

The solution is pretty simple: a white rectangle over which the barcode can be printed in black. Conversely,  reverse printing, print a black rectangle before printing the quiet zones and spaces in white. Simpler, affix a pre-printed thermal or thermal transfer label. But don’t rely on the bare plastic substrate—its spectral behavior is too variable.

Please share your comments or experiences.

 

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager