The GS1 organization estimates that the worldwide average number of barcodes scanned each day is more than 5 billion. Without a doubt, this testifies to how relatively easy it is to print acceptable quality barcodes. Yet there are vexing barcode quality problems, and one of the most misunderstood is lamination. Ironically, lamination is required in applications where the barcode’s role is most critical: health care, medical devices and pharmaceuticals.


Lamination is the process of bonding a plastic overlay onto printed material. Sometimes it is thought to enhance the appearance and attractiveness of the package or label. Most often, laminate makes the package more durable. In a health care environment, a laminate protects the printed material from disinfectant sprays or wipes. Although printed information is preserved and remains legible, barcodes can become illegible even though they look acceptable.

Not all laminates are the same. There are differences in transparency, surface types, thickness and adhesives. Any of these factors can make even a high quality barcode difficult to scan. Why? Scanning detects the reflective differences in a barcode. Anything that detracts from the reflective differences makes scanning difficult—or impossible.


Laminate Properties

  • Surface

A glossy surface can diminish the reflective difference between the dark values (bars) and light values (spaces and quiet zones).

A matte surface can soften the transitions from dark (bars) to light (spaces), making the relative differences in their widths less acute.

  • Transparency

Laminates that are more translucent will deteriorate barcode performance more than clear laminates. Laminate formulation, interaction with the substrate or the ink on its surface, effects of time and temperature can all be factors.

  • Thickness

Thickness can optically relocate features and edges, much the way items in water can appear bent or shifted. This can be aggravated when applied to a curved surface, where the drop-off angle increases at the edges of the barcode.

  • Adhesive

Even if the laminate material is optically clear, the adhesive is an additional layer with its own optical properties, its own sensitivity to substrate, time and temperature.

  • Application

Laminate material can change its optical properties depending on how it is applied, and what it is applied to. Application speed and pressure can affect the surface of the substrate. Variations in process heat, either inherent or generated by the process can also change the substrate surface. Laminates can react chemically to the substrate, causing and trapping bubbles, disrupting the integrity of the barcode image.


Narrow spaces are particularly affected by laminate. Binary barcodes with smaller X dimensions and smaller wide-to-narrow ratios are more affected than barcodes with larger X dimensions and wide-to-narrow ratios. Struggling to fit a Code 39 or ITF barcode onto a small label and using an X dimension smaller than 10 mil, a laminate can render the entire project impossible.

There are solutions if trading partners all consent:

  • Encode less data to make it possible to increase X dimension and wide-to-narrow ratio

Attempting to encode more and more data on a small label is a squeeze play that will inevitably reach an end. Less data could be a solution…or….

  • Use a larger label

….to make space available.

  • Switch from 1D barcode to 2D

2D symbologies have only one element (dot) size and can encode data more efficiently, taking up less space. This could make it possible to use a larger X dimension and allow for the required laminate.

Once a laminate is tested and accepted, users are advised to avoid unnecessary changes in laminate manufacturer, vendor, substrate material, ink and application methods. Promised savings can quickly disappear when barcode problems arise.


A FINAL THOUGHT

Verify your barcodes before they are laminated. Laminating an average or marginal barcode will not improve it.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager