The FDA Rule for Unique Device Identifiers on medical devices may be old news, but can be a steep slope for new medical device companies and their label or package providers. Here are some key points in sorting it out.

UDI is a Two-part Barcode

The Unique Device Identifier or UDI is a barcode, most often containing two data sets. The primary data set is the Device Identifier (DI); the secondary set is a Production Identifier (PI). The DI identifies the device. Think if it as a member of a family. The PI further identifies a more specific sub-group in that family: lot or batch, serial number, date of manufacture or expiration date.

The UDI must appear on every level of packaging of that product or device, from individuals to inner and master cartons. The logistics unit, such as the pallet, does not require UDI marking.

1D and 2D Barcodes

Barcode type is not specified, although the FDA rule does require devices to be barcoded. Several barcode symbologies are acceptable. Linear barcodes such as UPC, Code 39 and Code 128 are commonly used. 2D symbols include Data Matrix and QR Code. Which barcode type to use is a decision based on your trading partners and the supply chain.

When marking a medical device with a barcode, the FDA rule requires that the barcode and the Human Readable Interpretation (HRI) be present. The HRI is the text of letters and numbers encoded in the barcode. The rule also specifies the readable data format.

Medical Device Kits

Medical devices in kit form must also be UDI marked, but the components within the kit do not need to be individually marked, unless they are pharmaceuticals, also sold separately.

Misinterpretation of the FDA rule leads to some common mistakes. One example is in formatting the HRI. The FDA rule requires offsetting the DI and PI prefixes in parentheses. A typical UDI barcode will look like this:



Common UDI Mistakes

The common mistake is to encode the parentheses in the barcode.

Barcodes are “data carriers.” Linear barcodes can get very long when numerous DI’s are used. Sometimes they exceed the scan width of the scanner. It is tempting to convert to a 2D symbology such as Data Matrix, which has a higher data capacity and a smaller footprint. This decision must be made in concert with trading partners.

Another common UDI mistake is to incorrectly format date codes, such as date of manufacture or expiration date. The FDA rule specifies a data format of YYYYMMDD for the HRI, but the encoded data format must be YYMMDD. Confusing!

Verify!

Barcode verification is the best way to ensure that your UDI barcodes are compliant, both with ISO print quality standards and UDI (or HIBCC) data format specifications. Some medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers purchase barcode verifiers. Others prefer to use an independent barcode testing service.

Your comments and questions are always welcome. Contact us here.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager