Your ISO compliant barcode verifier is telling you your barcodes aren’t perfect—great. But how do you use the information in the report to improve your barcodes? In this article we’ll discuss the verification reports for 1D barcodes. We will discuss 2D symbols in a later article.

Quick review. The ISO grade for a barcode is the lowest grade for any one parameter. If everything is an A but Modulation is a D, the final symbol grade will be a D.

We are mixing metaphors a bit here since the ISO system reports grades numerically. We will discuss the equivalent alphanumeric ANSI grade for sake of simplicity.

Symbol Contrast

Symbol contrast is a simple subtraction of the Dark reflectance value or RMin from the Light Reflectance value or RMax. The RMin value must always be the bars and the RMax must always be the background or substrate. If Symbol Contrast is not grading at least a C, chances are the RMax is too low or the combination of the two values are colors that are marginal. RMax should be 80% or higher and RMin should be in single digits.

Minimum Edge Contrast

This parameter measures the contrast difference between adjacent bars (RMin) and spaces (RMax)  across the barcode. Any area where this contrast difference is non-uniform will cause this parameter to be downgraded. A substrate which has areas of dirt or solvent that cause the RMin pigment to be lower in contrast will trigger this parameter.

Modulation

Non-uniformity of substrate reflectivity across the barcode of the will result in varying RMax values, which are measured and graded in the Modulation parameter. A gradient background will do this. Likewise, non-uniform bars caused by variations in ink depositing will trigger Modulation problems.

This can be most graphically observed in the Scan Reflectance Profile and is most often seen above the Global Threshold line–when the spaces transition through it, as they do not in this example.

Defects

Voids in bars or spots in spaces can confuse the scanner, thinking that a void is actually a space between two bars or a spot is a bar. A substrate that is dirty can cause ink adherence problems, leading to Defects.

Inspect a barcode with Defects problems with a low power magnifier to actually see what is causing the problem—and how to resolve it.

Decodability

Low scores in Decodability are always the result of poor dimensional accuracy within the barcode. This could be caused by excessive bar gain, which is not an ISO parameter but which a high quality verifier will test and report. It is often a problem when other parameters such as Modulation are downgraded—check to see.

If Decodability alone is downgraded, the dimensional inaccuracies may be the result of inadequate printer resolution or a mis-match between the resolution of the printer and the design file that is driving it. Here again, a high quality verifier will report the dimensional properties of the barcode to isolate exactly where the problem is occurring.

Decode

A barcode will fail the Decode parameter if a quiet zone has been violated, a check digit is incorrect or if there is a basic structural error such as an incorrect start/stop pattern. In thermal printing this can sometimes be caused by a burned out print head pixel.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager