Here we go again with wild and crazy barcodes. The barcode risk management business can seem oppressively serious, but that is simply not true: it can be downright fun! We are inviting you to join the fun—more about that later. First, here are some of the better (worse) barcodes we have seen lately:

On the left, the QR Code in this advertisement looks sleek and horizontal. Unfortunately it should look square and fails the ANU parameter for Axial Nonuniformity.


The QR Code on the right fails the FPD parameter for Fixed Pattern Damage, because of the quiet zone violations at the top and left of the symbol.

QR Codes should have a full surround quiet zone of 4X, or four times the X dimension or module size.

 


 

Looking at these QR Codes is a reminder of the many times marketers have puzzled over why the QR Code has not experienced widespread acceptance in the US, as it has elsewhere. Do you think that might have something to do with QR codes like these?


The QR Code on the left has been designed–to death. What has been done is a nice idea, but remembering that the symbol is there to send a viewer to a website makes the design decision a questionable idea. The designer’s defense is always…“…but it makes it more likely a viewer will scan it…”

The brand owner’s response should always be…“…but it makes it less likely it will work.”


Here are some fun 1D barcodes.

You can always count on R.C. Bigelow for interesting design license with the barcodes on their tea. On the right, this is from their Earl Grey product, recounting the days of tea transported across the oceans by wind power.


On the left, the barcode cleverly emulates the golden blossom of the chamomile flower

Few designers have exercised a freedom this unfettered with barcodes. Most notably, Bigelow’s barcodes, although highly creative and attention arresting, always work. Unlike what is so often the case, not just with QR Codes but with other types of barcodes too, Bigelow’s barcodes are an example of a great collaboration between the graphic designers and the brand owner. Working together toward a common goal, they really got it right.


Sub-minimal size UPC’s are not unusual but it is a bit rare to find them on health packaging.

This tiny NDC3 GTIN 12 (UPC) is 51% magnification, well below the minimum 80% size for a symbol of this type.

It is remarkably well printed considering the very small X dimension–about .0066″. Printing a barcode this small challenges the printer as well as the  scanner. It is difficult to reproduce many thousands of these images successfully when the tolerances are so small–but even if you do, those perfectly reproduced, very small x dimensions may not be readable with the scanner. A pity since this product package has plenty of room for a larger, compliant symbol.


Here is the invitation mentioned earlier. When you find a barcode that catches your eye, visit BarcodesGoneWild.com. Post images of interesting (whatever “interesting” means to you) barcodes there. Then, share the fun: tell the world and send a link on social media!

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager