Everybody knows that barcode quality standards are the basis for predicting whether or not a barcode will scan correctly, or at all, as it travels through the supply chain to the end customer or user. But did you know that barcode standards can also help you get the best possible verification grade on your barcodes?

Recently, we tested a batch of barcodes for a supplier to the automotive industry. The supplier was informed that their barcodes must achieve at least an ANSI C grade.  They were getting lower grades, and were concerned.

Standards–the Problem or the Solution?

Aside #1: Standards are often viewed as THE PROBLEM TO BE OVERCOME. The purpose of the standard is to predict successful barcode scanning on any scanner. The parameters in the barcode print quality standards help to determine ways to enhance scanning performance. Poor barcode quality is the issue highlighted by the standard.

Almost all of our customer’s label samples had significant print gain, and the ISO parameter Modulation and the new parameter Print Gain were consistently downgrading their Data Matrix barcodes

However, most of their sample labels were grading at the minimum ANSI C grade level required, but the supplier had stated that the grading was much lower. Why was there a discrepancy between our grading and theirs? Was their verifier out of calibration or malfunctioning?  When we questioned the supplier about the verifier settings, they assured us they were using the same settings they had always used. This was a bit of a non-answer.

Aside #2: The GS1 General Specifications are one of many standards for barcodes. Automotive companies often use other standards, including ISO or internal, proprietary standards. Why? To optimize the barcode to their ERP, manufacturing, or supply chain processes. These are closed-loop systems that don’t mesh with the external world.

Some automotive manufacturers use ISO barcode quality specifications, which can differ from GS1 standards. We tested the supplier’s labels using our verifier set to ISO standards, resulting in better grade results. Also, our verifier was updated to the latest ISO standard for fractional grading of 2D barcodes. This update can often improve grading, especially for the ISO parameter Modulation.

Getty Images from Unsplash

It is important to understand that standards are designed to provide the plain truth about barcode performance. Although they are sometimes viewed as bad news, standards tell  you not just how your barcodes grade, but also how to properly grade them. Following those guidelines will give you the best possible results for that specific scanning system. Standards also provide insights on how to improve barcode grading based on specific quality attributes. If it’s reporting a Fixed Pattern Damage problem, first look for a quiet zone violation. Modulation? Look at print gain.

Aside #3: Your awareness of the applicable industry standard is important when configuring the verifier software. No verifier automatically detects that a specific industrial standard applies to a barcode, just by scanning it. You have to set the verifier for MilStd130N or HIBC. Verifiers are smart but they need operator input.

Comments and questions are welcome. Schedule a free 30-minute meeting here.

 

 

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager