Just because these barcode mistakes are simple does not mean they are obvious—many of them are subtle—so subtle that some verifiers don’t detect them.Image15

Barcode mistakes fall into two broad categories: design errors and printing errors. Neither is more important than the other. Perfect printing cannot overcome flawed design, but neither can perfect design overcome poor printing.

Truncation

Each barcode symbology has its own design specification which defines the width-to-height aspect ratio for the barcode.  This is intended to make the barcode easy to scan and decode from any angle. Truncation or shortening barcode below the specified height makes it less likely it will scan at any angle. Barcodes on a conveyor line may be missed. Barcodes in a retail checkout will require rescans.

Below Minimum Magnification (UPC/EAN)Image14

When these symbols are designed below the 80% minimum size, it reduces bar and space width tolerances, making the printer’s job more difficult and the symbols more likely to fail to scan.

Data Structure Mistakes

Incorrectly structured barcode data spells disaster. One of the simplest structural mistakes is a wrong (or absent) check digit. Some (but not all) design software preclude this. A more complicated and easy to commit mistake is to arrange the data sequence incorrectly, to encode an Application Identifier or the application data such as “Expiration Date” incorrectly. Again, some but not all design software prevent these errors.

Incorrect Wide/Narrow Ratio (ITF, Code 39)

Scanners identify different types of barcodes based on bar and space widths and patterns. When the design relationship between wide and narrow elements is violated, a scanner may be unable to recognize the symbology, or Image16may mistake it for the wrong symbology.

Incorrect Bar Width Reduction

Press gain or dot gain or ink spread—whatever you call it, reducing the bar width is an important way to make sure the printed bar code will scan successfully.  Inaccurate bar width reduction (BWR) is probably the most common reason for barcodes failure. It is easy to determine the right BWR—just measure the printed bar and compare it to the width of the bar in the design file. The amount of gain is the amount of BWR that should be used in the design file. Beware, font-based design files do not permit BWR—don’t use font files to produce barcodes.

Violated Quiet Zones

Design errors often cause this problem, made worse by excessive print or dot gain. Different symbologies have different quiet zone specifications, and designers can mistakenly assume that there is a standard quiet zone for all barcode types and sizes. There is only a minimum quiet zone requirement—no limit at the maximum size. Why not make quiet zones generous and avoid any problems?QZ Violation

Wrong Location on the Package

GS1 Standards specify the proper location of the bar code on most types of packages.  Barcodes on consumer products should be on the natural bottom of the box or bag. ITF-14 barcodes should be on the side of shipping containers so that scanner on conveyor systems can read them.

Wrong Barcode for the Package

Verifiers will tell you what the encoded information is, but most verifiers won’t signal a wrong barcode for the package.  The only thing more disastrous than a barcode that doesn’t scan is a wrong barcode that scans perfectly. If product A is marked with the barcode for product B, the retailer will have inaccurate information about what they sold and how their inventory should be replenished. It’s a nightmare.

 

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager