In a previous article, we took a bird’s eye look at the ISO 15415 report, and defined the pass/fail and graded parameters that are the basis for the final symbol grade. Understanding the parameters does not necessarily equate to knowing how to improve a low parameter grade. Over the next few weeks we will bridge that gap, starting with Modulation–one of the most likely causes of a low ISO 15415 grading on a QR Code or Datamatrix symbol.

To review: modulation evaluates the uniformity of Minimum and Maximum reflectance values. Variations caused by show-through from a non-opaque background or other patterns, or uneven dark elements (dots or squares) will lower this graded parameter. Here is an example:

Print quality in this Datamatrix symbol is quite good, but the background graphics create variability in the Minimum Reflectance values, which confuse the scanner. Eliminate this problem by removing the background noise or printing the symbol on an opaque substrate.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Modulation problems can also be caused by print gain. Like the bars and spaces in a 1D barcode, the squares in a 2D symbol are both dark and light, and should be dimensionally equal. Overprinting causes the dark elements to encroach on the light elements, making them dimensionally smaller and less reflective. This is particularly acute when dark elements surround a single light element.

Here are two examples:

 

 

Both of these symbols evidence severe print gain. The Data Matrix code was printed on a thermal transfer printer. Incompatibility of the ribbon to the label stock will cause gain issues on thermal transfer printing. A high thermal head temperature setting will also cause gain problems on thermal transfer or direct thermal printing.

The QR Code was inkjet sprayed. Gain can be caused by absorbent substrate, an ink incompatibility, spray nozzles at the wrong distance from the substrate or an incorrect transport speed.

Static (non-variable) lithographic and flexographic printing is not immune to gain problems. Causes include incorrectly made printing plates and excessive impression pressure. These technologies are infrequently used to print QR Code and Data Matrix symbols.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Modulation downgrading is also caused by streaks or defects in dark elements. A failed pixel in a thermal print head is a common cause. Substrates with oil or solvent stains, dirt or dust can result in voids in dark elements or gradient transitions between dark and light elements. Close visual inspection with a low power magnifier will usually reveal such problems.

Comments and questions are always welcome.

 

 

 

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager