There are few things less exciting than barcodes on corrugated, although barcode failures can certainly cause excitement. Retail-level barcoding is not recommended on the undulating corrugated surface because the smaller bar widths are more sensitive to printing inaccuracies. The workhorse ITF-14 accommodates this but some cautions remain.

Beyond Flexo

Inkjet has replaced flexo printing in many packaging plants, creating some interesting, unexpected problems. A recurring question we hear is about the bearer bars that are still required by GS1.

Bearer Bars

Most people equate bearer bars with the flexo process, which is not incorrect. As the name implies, bearer bars help to maintain a uniform amount of pressure of the flexo plate against the corrugated substrate. This prevents the narrow bars from excessive spreading and distortion. But inkjet printing is non-contact, so isn’t the need for bearer bars eliminated? But the GS1 General Specification still requires them. Here is what the standard says:

• Bearer bars protect the barcode image, prevent distortion, and ensure accurate scanning
• Bearer bars must surround the barcode and quiet zones for plate printing
• Bearer bars are required only on the top and bottom of the barcode

Why does GS1 require bearer bars on non-contact printing? It is actually about the barcode itself and not the printing process.

Partial Scans

Visualize scanning an ITF barcode, a thin red line crossing the barcode. Imagine that line taking a diagonal path and running off the top or bottom of the barcode at some point—not a complete path from left to right across the barcode. A laser scanner could capture a scan from only a part of the barcode.
Wait a minute—wouldn’t the check digit catch the error if only part of the barcode is decoded?
ITF is a relatively crude symbology—I say that with a lot of respect: it’s an effective solution to an important problem. But its simplicity comes with vulnerability to partial scans.

Tutorial #1

ITF (Interleaved Two of Five) is one of very few symbologies where the check digit is optional(!). If there is no check digit, a partial scan is possible

The GS1 version requires a check digit but the scanner must be programmed to expect a check digit

Tutorial #2

OK, so if GS1 requires a check digit, wouldn’t that prevent a partial scan? OK, another quick tutorial. In many applications, scanners are programmed to accept only certain barcodes. A frontline scanner at a retail store is programmed to read only the product barcodes in the store. An alien barcode wouldn’t scan.

If a scanner has not been properly programmed to accept only GS1 ITF barcodes with a check digit, it could capture a partial scan. It’s a rare, perfect storm but it does happen.
The top and bottom bearer bars prevent a partial scan by adding an additional wide bar that would confuse the scanner and defeat the decode.

More Best Practices

Reducing the nominal height of the bars, aka truncation, makes a partial scan more likely. This is why GS1 prohibits truncation in all except unavoidable circumstances
Finally, for complete-surround bearer bars for flexo printing, don’t encroach the quiet zones! Remember, quiet zones have a minus-zero tolerance. If you place the vertical bearer bars right at the edge of the quiet zone, the slightest amount of print gain will violate the quiet zones! Your otherwise perfect barcode won’t scan.

Questions? Comments? Contact us here.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager