Best practices for any company involved in barcoding is to have a barcode quality policy. Who is a company “…involved in barcoding…? The short answer is any company with potential liability if a barcode does not perform as it should. That includes everybody who touches that barcode, from the graphics designer, the pre-press service, the package or label printer and ultimately the brand owner.

A barcode quality policy is the way a business with potential barcode liability manages that risk. It could be a simple statement, a comprehensive quality manual with a training program, or a connection with an independent barcode test lab such as Barcode-Test LLC to do all their testing or for periodic benchmarking of their internal barcode quality process.  The most serious companies may have all of these components in place.

Surprisingly there are companies with none of these components in place; some of them have even purchased verification equipment, although many have not. Apparently the key factor is belief vs. reality about “potential barcode liability.” Some believe that “…because we have never had a barcode problem, we never will.” The reality is that processes are never stable. Products, whether they are automobiles or pharmaceuticals or printed images of barcodes, vary in terms of quality. That’s why there are tolerances in design and execution specifications. Companies that “…have never had a barcode problem” are simply unaware of those times when their processes were marginal or even out-of-control, but their output was found acceptable to the broader tolerances of their end users.

This is not something to count on or take comfort in—this is not “…never had a problem.” This is living on borrowed time.

Companies that live in reality rather than belief understand this and proactively expect variation and monitor their processes. This is not done just with instrumentation, although this is an essential tool. Buying a verifier does not end the conversation about barcode quality. Most ironic of all are those companies who have gone to the expense of purchasing a verifier but not followed through with a policy about when it should be used.

A barcode quality policy will do this and much more.  The verifier must be matched to the task not just based on symbologies to be tested: it must have sufficient scan width or field of view, the correct apertures and the right industry applications to test the barcodes you handle. The verifier must be independently tested and certified to be ANSI/ISO compliant or the test results will not be guaranteed reliable.

This is just the beginning. Barcode quality policy must also specify when the verifier should be calibrated, and when in the company’s process the verifier is to be used. It should not be assumed that personnel know how to u se a verifier. Reputable manufacturers and resellers can provide training if necessary.

Companies who recognize the importance of quality best practices view them not only as good risk management, but also as providing the company a competitive advantage, not only in reducing

waste and protecting sales margins, but also in attracting and retaining loyal customers.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager