Bar width reduction or BWR is compensation in the bar code data file for press or dot gain. The act of putting ink onto a substrate almost always results in that image spreading. Scanning a bar code is negatively impacted by fattened bars and thinned spaces.  Bar width reduction factors the design file, reducing bar width but retaining bar positions, in anticipation of the print processes restoring the bars to nominal widths and if done correctly, cancelling the negative effect of ink spread.

Bar Width Reduction is the Most Important Thing that Can Be Done to Assure Bar Code Quality

Bar width reduction is arguably the simplest and most important thing that can be done to assure that a printed bar code will scan successfully. But bar width reduction is also one of the most misunderstood and misapplied factors in bar code quality. Why is this?

Bar width reduction is sometimes confused with scaling the bar code. BWR does not change the locations of the bars and spaces; it changes the width of the as-yet-unprinted bars but does not move them closer together on their centers, as scaling does.

Scaling the symbol to a larger size will increase the tolerance of the bar code to press gain. This may be where the confusion between scaling and bar width reduction comes from. But scaling the symbol to a smaller size will decrease the tolerance of the bar code to press gain. And scaling a bar code can introduce a host of other problems to the integrity of the bar code image well beyond its tolerance to press gain.

Some of the confusion is because of the nature of process compensation. Bar width reduction is a prediction of something that will happen in the future, not something that is completely known in the present time.

Bar Width Reduction is a Prediction of Something That Will Happen in the Future

Predicting the right amount of bar width reduction is not a complicated process—but neither is it a formula or a look-up on a chart. The best predictions always come from accurate historical data; the more data, the better. The interaction of different types of inks and substrates is a whole set of variables that must be measured and documented before bar width reduction can be predicted. Press set-up including blanket characteristics, roller pressure, plate durometer and other factors all contribute. Press condition is another consideration. The best way to control these variables is to document them and build a database that, over time, will include all possible combinations of factors and the results they yielded in bar code quality.

With diligence, over time, predicting bar width reduction becomes less of an art and more of a science. But where do you begin? Start with a bar code file with no bar width reduction. Document every step in the process and measure the results. If the bar code has gained .0015” in bar width, that is the bar width reduction for every future bar code printed on that press under those conditions, until something changes.

Bar Width Reduction is a Matter of Documenting Process Variables Over Time

Many of the press gain-related problems I’ve seen over the years are the result of not knowing how a bar code file has been bar width reduced. This is especially prevalent in customer-supplied bar code files. By documenting everything, whatever is not documented, such as the bar width reduction of a customer-supplied file, becomes obvious.

A diligently documented process over time produces amazing results: surprises disappear, quality improves, waste and cost and delays decrease and customers become more loyal.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager