pexels-pixabay

Use of DPM barcodes is on the rise. For the unfamiliar, DPM is Direct Part Marking. It is used in applications where a label or tag won’t work. For example, an engine block or subassembly like an exhaust manifold, starter, or generator. Automotive companies do use paper labels that serve the assembly process, but if the barcode needs to survive high heat or a harsh environment, DPM is the solution. Speaking of harsh environments, another common use is jet engine fan blades.

DPM = Direct Part Mark

Why would the barcode identification need to survive? If the use case requires tracking a part throughout its service life, the DPM barcode enables that. The barcode is a lookup tool, much the same way a UPC on a consumer product works. DPM look up can update a maintenance record, track oil changes in that engine, and predict when the service life is expected to end. It could be used to compare Part A to Part B to compare durability, frequency and types of maintenance issues.

DPM barcodes are used on medical implants. That links the implant used with the patient. If that implant fails, or needs to be recalled, the barcode provides that connection.

Marking directly onto a part creates a barcode that is less reflective than a barcode on a label. Scanning a DPM barcode requires special lighting. The standard which governs DPM barcode quality is different because there is very minimal reflective difference between the barcode image and the substrate.

DPM different than printed barcodes

There are as many methods for DPM imaging of barcodes as there are substrates. Peening is probably the least sophisticated: peening is defined as “…striking with a hammer…”. The barcode image is literally beaten into a (usually) metal surface. Acid etching is another method. The metal surface is coated with a photographic emulsion, exposed to an image of the barcode and then bathed in acid, permanently marking the metal with the barcode image.

Arguably the most common marking method is laser ablation, sometimes also (imprecisely) called etching.  In all cases the end result is the same, a very durable, low reflectance barcode image.

While DPM barcodes are very different than printed barcodes on labels or packaging, they share two key similarities: quality and compliance.

DPM is the same as printed barcodes

DPM quality refers to the barcode being legible to the scanner. The dimensional accuracy of the size of the dots or squares, and the accuracy of their location in a grid has a tolerance defined by an international standard. Furthermore, the data encoded by those dots or square must be correctly prefixed and parsed in accordance with the application. The automotive application structures the data differently than the aerospace application, and the medical device application is yet different.

DPM verification does not involve reflectivity and reflective differences between the barcode and background, that are important attributes in conventionally printed barcodes. But DPM barcodes, like all barcodes, are there for an important reason and must work right.

If you have questions about DPM or need assistance with a DPM concern or problem, we can help. Contact us here.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager