Using the verification report to resolve print quality and other problems is a straightforward process. Many of the ISO15415 parameters for 2D symbols will be familiar to someone who has worked with linear barcodes. Barcode quality is a matter of compliance. There are two compliance factors:

  • Print quality is the ISO 15415 standard
  • Data structure is the industry application

A perfectly printed symbol but with data format errors will fail. Likewise a poorly printed symbol but with perfectly parsed data will fail. What does this failure mean? It means the data is not readable in the barcode.

As with 1D barcodes, the data encoded in 2D symbols scans and decodes because of the reflectance difference between the symbol and its background. The ISO parameter Symbol Contrast measures and reports this. There must be only two reflectance values with the symbol: the light or RMax reflectance value, and the dark or Rmin reflectance value.

Symbol Contrast

Symbol Contrast grades from 4.0 (or A) to 0.0 9 (or F). To correct for a low Symbol Contrast grade, the Rmin value should be darker and the Rmax value should be lighter.

As a general rule, the printed symbol is the Rmin value; the background is the Rmax value. Each of these reflectance values should be uniform: the Rmin value should be uniformly dark, the

Axial Nonuniformity

RMax value uniformly light. The uniformity it measured and graded in the parameter Modulation.

Modulation

This parameter grades from 4.0 (A) to 0.0 (F). Downgraded Modulation indicates variability in either or both of the reflectance values. Look for and eliminate patterns in the background or in the symbol image.

Axial Nonuniformity

Grid Nonuniformity

Unlike 1D barcodes, 2D symbols can be distorted in both height and width. Visually, the dots or squares in the symbol will become rectangular rather than their normal square shape. This is called axial non-uniformity, and grades from 4.0 (A) to 0.0 (F). The solution for downgraded Axial Nonuniformity or ANU is to slow down the printer speed, but there could also be other process causes.

Grid Nonuniformity

The pattern of squares in a 2D symbol should be uniformly located on a grid. Deviations from the grid ar4 called Grid Nonuniformity of GNU. Visually this can make the symbol look like a parallelogram or trapezoid. Stretched or distorted substrate causes grid nonuniformity. There could be other causes in the process.

Fixed Pattern Damage

In addition to the encoded data, all 2D symbols have common features called Fixed Patterns. These help the scanner align itself to the symbol so it knows when the encoded data starts and stops. Fixed patterns also help the scanner calibrate itself to the Rmin and Rmax values. The surrounding quiet zone required on most 2D symbols is part of the graded Fixed Pattern Damage or FPD parameter. Thus, the fixed patterns are very important, and when they are damaged, the symbol will fail.

“Designer” QR Code

Unlike 1D barcodes, which can have error detection capability through use of check digits, 2D symbols are capable of error correction using mathematical formulas such as the Reed Solomon method. Significant use of the error correction downgrades the Unused Error Correction or UEC parameter. Many factors can contribute to this. A common one with QR Code is the unwise practice of customizing the symbol by putting logos or other graphics into the symbol. This self-inflicted wound can have unintended consequences: rather than making it more likely that the QR Code will be scanned, it makes it more likely the symbol will not work.

Comments are always welcome. Contact us here.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager