Barcode scanners work based on reflectivity and contrast.

The messages encoded in linear barcodes are decoded on the basis of the scanner’s ability to detect reflective and contrast differences.

In a pattern of lines and spaces, these critical differences are demarked by the edges—the places where the bar ends and the space begins. We think of these as hard boundaries but in fact, with a little magnification, we can see that what we think of as a hard edge is really more like a transition.

Edges are more like a transition than a hard delineation

Edges actually have width–just like bars and spaces do. The smaller that transition or width, the better; but whether an edge has a wide transition or a narrow one, there will be a width.

Edges with wide transitions makes it difficult for the scanner to determine where the bar terminates and the space begins, so edge determination is important enough to be one of the nine ANSI parameters.

Edges (Edge Determination) gauge how the scanner sees the edge between bars and spaces

Edge determination: measuring how a scanner is seeing edges. How can we see edges as scanners see them? The tool used by all ISO compliant verifiers is the Scan Reflectance Profile (SRP).

The SRP is a graphical representation of what the scanner “sees.” The upper half of the chart graphs the light reflectance features of the barcode—this is the quiet zones and the spaces between the bars. The top of the chart represents 100% reflectivity. The lower half graphs the dark reflectance features—the bars. The bottom of the chart represents 0% reflectivity.

The height of the graph is divided by an equatorial line called the Global Threshold or GT. It is at the GT where the scanner detects the reflectance and contrast transitions—this is where the edges are (or should be). The GT is where the scanner counts bars and spaces to determine what kind of symbol it is seeing.

A high performing barcode will product an SRP that is tall and symmetrical: the upper and lower halves of the graph will be equidistant from the GT; every bar and space will penetrate the GT and extend from it, up and down, equally.

The ANSI parameter called Edge Determination is what establishes where the GT line is located. Here is the formula:

GT = Reflectance minimum + (Symbol Contrast divided by 2)

Edges establish the location of the Global Threshold line

In the previous article, we learned that Reflectance minimum is the reflectance value of the bars, which must always be the dark elements; Symbol Contrast is a straight subtraction of the dark reflectance value from the light reflectance value.

The result of the calculation determines where the GT line is located for that particular symbol. Once the GT is established, transitions through the GT result in the bar/space count. If any bars or spaces fail to penetrate the GT, the symbol fails this parameter. This is almost always due to wide transition edges. Edge Determination is a Pass/Fail parameter. Failure here also results in failure of the Decode parameter.

Edges are a key factor in the whole verification process. It is possible for edges to pass this parameter and fail a subsequent parameter such as Reflectance Minimum or Edge Contrast Minimum, but if edges fail, nothing else matters.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager