Getty Images on unsplash

Two different, equally-important factors define barcode quality:

  • Print quality
  • Data structure

ISO Standards define print quality. For linear barcodes (parallel lines and spaces) it is ISO 15416. ISO 15415 addresses matrix or 2D barcodes. Each standard contains graded or pass/fail attributes that affect the legibility (scan-ability) of the barcode by a scanner.

Industry applications define barcode structure. Healthcare, automotive and aerospace barcodes use different data fields and prefixes.

A perfectly printed barcode with data structure errors will fail because the scanning system cannot interpret the captured data. Likewise, a poorly printed, but correctly structured barcode will also fail to scan.

Process Considerations: Pre-press

Upstream pre-print processes can make or break print quality and data structure. Software controls digital printing, including hybrid wet ink press with a digital head, and desktop thermal label printer. That software contains the critical barcode data and the data that controls dimensional aspects of the barcode image.

The physical act of applying pigment to a substrate often causes that image to spread. Porosity of the substrate in one reason. Impression roller is another. Sprayed pigment from ink jets is sensitive to nozzle pressure, distance from nozzle to substrate, viscosity of the ink, chemical contents of the ink and how it reacts to the substrate, and transport speed of the print process.

pexels-antoni-shkraba

Spreading of the barcode image is called gain. Design software contains a setting that compensates for gain, called bar width reduction, expressed in micrometers or thousandths of an inch. Other systems increment in pixels. It is important to apply bar width reduction appropriately for the print system. The best way to determine correct bar width reduction is empirically. Print and measure a dot or line of known width. Compensate the design file for gain.

 

Printing

Document all variables to replicate results on future print results. Variables include:

  • Substrate type and source
  • Pigment type and source
  • Printer settings including pressures and speeds
  • Post-production coatings and laminates

Data Control

pexels-sora-shimazaki

Match barcode design files  to the printer. If the printer is a vendor/contractor, the brand owner/customer may provide the barcode design file. Control over data and security drive this. Customer provided design files may neglect critical adjustments, like bar width reduction. Good communication between the printer and customer prevent this error opportunity.

This CAPA overview is based on the US Food and Drug Administration Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA) 03/28/2023 820.20 from Management Responsibility document.

This article addresses step 1, defining and documenting CAPA system procedures for the requirements for regulation of the quality system.

Next, we will examine in more detail the sources of product and quality problems.

Barcode-Test LLC

Comments and questions are welcome. Contact us here.

3db Barcode Testimonial

Our company (an advanced software company) recently worked with Barcode Test to source a barcode verifier.  Not long ago, we were awarded a contract requiring products to be marked with IUIDs in accordance with MIL-STD-130.  For that standard, marking labels must pass a verification test that evaluates many variables (contrast, size, clarity, syntax, modularity, and more).  After a thorough search, we reduced our options to a select few.

In our search for a verifier, the Axicon line caught our attention.  Barcode Test is our regional reseller for this product.   From the beginning, they were very prompt with their responses.  We ended up having a quick call with John Nachtrieb to go over our needs.  John was extremely easy to work with and provided a lot of great information.  He was very knowledgeable on the matter and was quick to offer up a demo unit (free of charge).

Upon receiving the demo verifier and testing it, a few questions arose.  John joined a call with us and answered all our questions.  Ultimately, the Axicon verifier wasn’t the best fit for us, so we shipped the demo back.  John was completely understanding.  A few weeks later, Barcode Test reached back out with another possible verifier for us to try.  While they didn’t sell that brand, they just wanted to help us find the best option that met our needs. They even offered to send us the unit that they have in-house to see if it worked to our liking. 

Barcode Test is truly a great company to work with.  Their service and willingness to help the customer are far beyond what you typically get from other companies.  They are experts in barcode quality assurance and seem willing to help in any way they can (even if that means not getting a sale and recommending another option that better fits the customer’s needs).  If anyone is in the market for barcode verification/scanning services or products, I would highly recommend giving Barcode Test a call.

Regards,

Production Manager