2D Barcode Verifier Confusion
Many people of my age refer to all photocopiers as Xerox machines. At last count, there were at over 30 different brands of photocopier. The same is true, at least in the world of beliefs, about barcode verifiers generally and 2D verifiers in particular. Like photocopiers, barcode verifiers are not all the same. We are a barcode testing lab: we can state that with some authority. Beliefs: meet fact.
Without naming names, here are some of the ways in which Brand X, Y and Z differ from a user and performance standpoint than Brand A:
- Some 2D verifiers get less than repeatable results when the barcode is located in different areas of the field of view. This is concerning since your barcode risk management strategy relies heavily upon verification results that are accurate, repeatable and reproducible
- All 2D verifiers require a power source to operate; all but one require wall current in addition to a communications connection to the host PC. One brand take power through the communications cable. This makes it virtually portable but without the tradeoffs that come with portability. There is only 1 true portable 2D verifier on the market at this time (with an indefinite future) but there are tradeoffs. Most notably, the field of view is very small.
- 2D barcodes have quiet zones, as do 1D barcodes (with the exception of Aztec Code). However, 2D verifiers report it differently—less clearly—than do 1D verifiers. There is no ISO parameter or Traditional verification attribute for “quiet zone”. A quiet zone failure is reported as a Decode or a Fixed Pattern Damage fail. This can make it vexing to figure out why your 2D symbol is failing when all of the other parameters are grading well. Is there a structural problem with the barcode? Look for a quiet zone problem.
- All 2D verifiers can test and grade 1D barcodes too. Most 2D verifiers require the 1D symbol to be oriented in the X (ladder) direction or the Y (picket fence) direction within a few degrees. If the 1D barcode slightly exceeds the long dimension of the field of view, it is tempting to position it diagonally in the field of view—remember high school geometry: this is the hypotenuse of the right triangle. Only one brand allows you to do this—and coald save you the expense of having to buy an additional 1D verifier to handle your larger barcodes.
2D verifiers test and grade to a different ISO standard than 1D verifiers. This can be confusing. Some of the 1D grading parameters you are already familiar with are there—but there are others that may be utterly unfamiliar. Then there are those ambiguous-sounding parameters like “Modulation” and “Decodability”. What needs to be done to improve a “Decodability” downgrade when you are standing there, looking at your thermal transfer printer?
Stay tuned. Soon we will talk about those in a future article.
#barcode #2D barcode #quality #verification
John helps companies resolve current barcode problems and avoid future barcode problems to stabilize and secure their supply chain and strengthen their trading partner relationships.